Tuna again In Fault-Finding England, It's a Cause for Divorce Essay

Tuna again In Fault-Finding England, Its a Cause for come apart - Essay ExampleBecause of this, complaints include the mundane, absurd and occasionally the bizarre. However, I argue that Lyall takes a serious oermaster much too lightly and that her implied solution, does nothing to fix the problem, instead it is an attempt to hold the residuum of the world to a particular standard, which does not appear to be working very well anyway. Lyall is adamant about criticizing the linked Kingdom system of divorce, implying that the most effective solution for the problem of divorces in the joined Kingdom would be to move to the American model, and allow for no-fault divorce. However, how much of a problem is there in the United Kingdom? In the United Kingdom, the divorce rate for 2010 is 11.1 divorces per 1,000 individuals in the married population. If one takes into billhook the fact that a married couple consists of two individuals, this is a rate of a little over 20% of marriages fa il (Rogers 2011). Furthermore, it is estimated that around 70% of these divorces occur for first marriages (Divorce Rate 2009), suggesting that either people interpret from their mistakes, or that few remarry. These statistics are different in the United States, where the divorce rate is approximately 50% (Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2012), that is, half of all marriages end in divorce. The relationship of divorce to subjugate of marriage is also different, with second marriages having a high rate of divorce than first, and third marriages having an even higher rate (Divorce Rate 1999). These figures suggest that marriages fare significantly better in the United Kingdom than in the United States. This might be a result of the United Kingdom system of divorce be more difficult, but the article by Lyall implies this is not the case. She suggests that results are not more complicated in the United Kingdom, just that they focus on more trivial matters. Therefore, if t his trend is not caused by a difficultly in divorcing, the next logical answer is that marriages in the United Kingdom fare better than their United States counterparts. This raises some important questions. For example, does the United Kingdom system of divorce help to keep couples together? This account is not as unreasonable as it sounds as thinking and writing out reasons for the divorce may help couples to confront their problems, and to realize how trivial many of these actually are. This allows room for much more comment than the American process, where couples may not even be certain between themselves why they are divorcing. Lyall argues that creating a no-fault divorce would remove the requirement for judges and lawyers to determine fault in the divorce. As she explains, currently under(a) the United Kingdom law a divorce must fall into one of five categories out front it can be granted. The most common category is unreasonable behavior, which as Lyall shows, can cove r a wide range of different types of behavior. However, Lyall appears to believe that moving to a no-fault divorce system would not make up the rates of divorce. This argument is heavily flawed, as by its very nature, making divorce easier would increase how ofttimes it occurs. For example, in the United Kingdom the practice of extended separation is common, and this is often used to provide try out for a future divorce claim (National Family Mediation 2010). This practice can help couples to understand what they lack