Foreign Direct Investment Disadvantages Essay

There is a lot to be said for big retail to come to India, but we female genitalsnot simply be interpreted in and mimic something which is being pushed down our throats because those who make the polity appear to not have the faintest soupcon on how retail really works in India If there were trenchant answers in black and discolour to the question, there would really be no need for any debate on the issue, but the right is that it is simply not that simple.On a philosophical and emotional level, the answer could be that any do work of foreign participation in a interior(prenominal) market is rife with dangers of the colonialism sort, but in this twenty-four hour period and age, while the core concept of being wary of foreign dominance may still be true, the fact remains that there be plenty of musical modes to ensure that it works on a win-win basis for all concerned. The main problem with the current status of foreign direct investment (FDI) in retail in India is that it does not provide a level playing field to different players of the domestic and small sort.In addition, it appears to take a rather naive and simplistic view on original aspects, which like myths being repeated, tend to become urban legends. On the other hand, no country can afford to take on an isolationist approach. To start with, it may help to go by dint of the solid ground and policy note on the Cabinet decision on FDI in retail, as put up on various places on the internet. Facebook, PIB) As this writer sees it, with a holistic view of the subject and not just based on jingoism of the burn down the malls (right view) and bad for farmers (left view) sort, but on sane evaluation of larger issues, there ar some points which need to be straightened out. Large retail is inevitable, and that is a simple truth, but there has to be larger perspective for public good which seems to be absent from this policy. The people of India come first, including those who want a infract pro duct or service buying or selling experience, and at the end of the day it is their wallets which will decide where they go.But at the same time, the government, with the policy as outlined above, cannot sell the baby with the bath-water, and make things worse. Some suggestions 1) The present Agriculture Produce grocery Committee (APMC) Act requires urgent revamp if we really want to help the rural and agricultural sectors with a better go to market scenario. This, along with rapid introduction of the goods and services levy (GST) as swell up as ease of inter- and intra-state movement of victualsgrain, agri products and fresh produce, would do more to improve matters, as well as do wonders for our conomy in a variety of waysmost of all in terms of coercive prices as well as reducing storage and transit losses. 2) The policy shown above makes a fibre that brands by big FDI retailers need to be carried across borders without in any way making it clear that the quality of those b rands needs to be same across borders, too. As of now we see that with these manufacturers and retailers there is one(a) lower quality for sale in India and there is a better quality for sale in developed countriescase in point being soft drinks, processed foods, confectionery, electronics, motor vehicles and others.If anything is by way of a different quality for India for price or other reasons, then let it be all the way marked as such. 3) Specifically in the case of packaged and processed foods, the policy does not tell anything about adherence to best case scenarios in terms of testing groundelling of ingredients and avoiding mislead marketing ploys, thereby leading to a situation where outright dangerous products are foisted on Indian consumers. The amount of product expatiate available for consumers in developed countries must be matched for India, too.India cannot become a vast chemistry lab for processed foods or anything else. 4) More empirical data needs to be provi ded on subjects like improvement in supply chain. India is the country where the passenger rail ticket deliveries, fresh hot cooked food by dabbawallas and diamonds as well as other precious stones by angadias have set better than global standards in supply chains, so the same standards need to be quantified and applied to those seeking c% FDI in retail. It is not too much to ask for them to match the Indian standardsunless those who made the policy are ashamed of our prowess. ) The investments in retail by the FDI route, when they come, should come only through a short-list of recognised task adherence countries. The misused option of FDI coming in through known or suspect tax havens needs to be blockedfirmly. Likewise, full disclosures of the strictest sort need to be made on who the investors areagain, these cannot be suitcase corporate identities hiding behind consultants and banks in shady tax havens or other countries. Unlike what happened in, for example, airlines, Indians need to know who is investing and from where.And in case there are legal issues, then we need to know who the faces are who will go through the Indian legal system, unless those who made the policy are ashamed of our legal system. 6) The payment processing and cash management as well as tax adherence part of this industry, both in terms of procurement and sale, need to be through the Indian banking system. And by fully transparent methods, so that float as well as reckon remains in India at all times, as is the case in developed countries.