Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of God

Cosmological Argument For The Existence Of deityHow did the human beings begin? Throughout history, that question has probably been the most debated topics amidst the philosophical, scientific and religious communities. I call back it is human nature in us that continues to seek the answers to why and how and not just sit top on blind faith. Even with todays advances in science about our universe and its origin, we atomic number 18 no closer to providing solid establishment for what caused the beginning of the universe or proving if it just ever so existed. I actually find that real interesting in the fact that through the major advancements in the medical field, scientist buzz off successfully found vaccinations for diseases that withstand killed millions, robots that perform surgery, cl whizd animals, and the list could go on and on. But science has provided no solid evidence on how the universe got its beginning. Many philosophers and theologians believed that the exist ence of the universe needed an accounting. Plato (c.427-347 BCE) and Aristotle (c. 384-322 BCE) were among the earlier philosophers who attempt to answer the question in what became bashn as the cosmological arguments. fit to Plato in his dialogue The Laws he argued that campaign in the world and the population was imparted motion that required rough kind of self-originated motion to set it in motion and to maintain that motion. Aristotles arguments were centered around the fact that things just dont exist, slide fastener comes from nothing, there needed to be a cause. During his study he agnise that for every cause, there is one before it that caused it to happen, which eventually he realized, caused an unnumerable backwards cause of causes. Ultimately coming to the conclusion that there essential have been a first cause. St. Thomas doubting Thomas is considered to be one of the greatest Christian philosophers that ever lived. He was also an Aristotelian scholar. Aquina s adapted Aristotles first cause for things in motion but did not stop there. Aquinas began under the assumption that if things be in motion then it had been caused to be in motion by something else. But if that were the case, that would get to an infinite regression which he believed to be incorrect because that meant there was dumb no starting point but he knew at some point, it was set in motion. Aquinas explanation was, there must have been a first-case, the un-caused, cause. Aquinas believed that the un-caused causer was divinity fudge. Another way he tried to proof his point was the argument for contingency. He explained that there are natural things that are possible to exist or not to exist. But it is impossible for these to always exist. So if it is possible for things not to exist, than at one time, nothing could have existed. Aquinas cosmological argument for the existence of God is known to be the most popular by philosopher and religious scholars. In his theological masterpiece, Summa Theologia, he proposed varies forms of cosmological arguments to explain ways that he thought would prove God exists. Many skeptics do not accept the existence of God because to them, there is no logical explanation for his existence. Some of the oppositions are listed belowIf everything has a cause, what caused the first cause God?If God did create the universe, how do we know it was just one God?If we accepted the argument that such a being created the universe, how do we know he had anything to do with religion?The return key argument indicated that the cosmological argument do not necessarily transcend to the conclusion that there was a being that is responsible for the creation of the universe. Theists believe that God is self existent. God is omnipotent (all powerful), omnipresent (everywhere at once), wise (all knowing) and omnisapient (has all wisdom). They believe that God is exempt from the uncaused cause because he is eternal and not dependent on a cause for his existence. They go on to say that we may never know why or how creation took place or to explain Gods intentions of the event but he is an omniscient and omnipotent being. God does not need a creator to exist. The cosmological arguments seeks to prove the existence of God. To those that belief in God, there are no questions concerning his existence. For it is him that created everything. They believe that The Bible has scripture that goes along with these arguments and proves his existence. To the non-believers, they think that the cosmological arguments provide no evidence of the existence of God and that it just raises to a greater extent questions about the origin or the universe. Could it be that there is no explanation? Did the universe just happen or has it always existed? This may be one of those questions that science bequeath never have an answer for and to that everyone will accept. Until then, religion is a personal choice. No answer is right or wrong. I personally believe that God exist and that there is proof, to me public that he does.